|
- Global Warming and Tidal Rise in the Upper Keys -
[This section is under
construction]
By Jerry
Wilkinson
July,
2009
The new buzz words seems to be
Global Warming and Tidal Rising. Actually, it probably began with
Rachel Carson's book, Under the Sea
Wind, in 1941 published by Simon
& Schuster. My research shows it becoming a
subject of considerable discussion in the Key
in the early 1960s as a result of studies and exploration of the major
petroleum companies in the Keys areas - primarily the Shell Oil
Company. I say the Keys, but by far the majority was in its
off-shore waters. Back in 1983, Hoffman. Keys and Titus in an U.S. E.
P. A study forecasted the tides to rise from 1.4 to 2.2 cm for
the next 100 years. Multiply cm by 0.3937 for inches which would be an
average of about three quarters of an inch per year or slightly over
six feet in 100 years. Even using he lower rate of 1.4 cm would equate
to about 55 inches or four and a half feet. This would mean that
Stock Island, most of Big Pine and Lower Matecumbe Key are under water.
Ocean Reef would also be, but they have filled many of
residential
lots to meet FEMA codes. All the access highways would however be under
water. In general it could be generalized that the Lower Keys would
cease to exist. According to D. M. Robbin in 1984 in Environments of South Florida, Past and
Present, a study of data from the past 8,000 years revealed that
the sea level has risen an average of 11 cm (4.33") per 100 years. Over
the 8,000 year period this would equate to a 28.9 foot rise. For
reference, this would have been the Archaic Period (8,000
b.c. to 750 b.c.) for the Paleo Native American Indian
period.
At the present for historical use
I use figures from a Bob Carr archaeological report for which
credits a 'Scholl-1967.' For younger archaeological sites such as ours
in the Upper Keys, 3,000 years ago (BP) to present use 3.5 cm per 100
years. For older Florida sites between 6,000 to 3,000 years ago
use 2.54 cm per 100 years.
Now for the future - A 2009
report from a "international climate
panel" report given at Marathon predicted a best-case 17.8 cm (7
inches) rise and the worse case as 59 cm ( 23.2 inches) rise for the
21st century.
Before I move on to maps depicting
results of a one meter (39
inch) rise at selected areas I suggest that one might visit the Internet for more predictions. Starting with
"Wikipedia" at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level is as good
as any but do not suggest that it is final! Then one editorial
statement - the sea level has been rising for
about 26,000 years, yet 100,000 years ago one could have walked to
Molasses Reef.
First, the
seas will not just rise in the
Keys, or just in Florida - for certain it will rise through out
the Northern
Hemisphere - and since water seeks its own level it will rise to
some extent around the globe. Secondly, when we address 100 year
increments please look back just one increment to say 1910 compare
history.
The following presentation
is from an abstract of LIDZ, B.H.
and SHINN, E.A., 1990, Paleoshorelines, Reefs, and a Rising Sea: South
Florida, U.S.A., Journal of Coastal
Research, 7(1), 203-229 Fort Lauderdale, ISSN 0749-0208,
published by U.S. Geological Survey, Center for Coastal Studies, 600
4th St. South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701, U.S.A. This is a valuable
document, After the introduction, first are shown charts of the Keys
shorelines 8,000 years before present, then 6,000 years and then
2,000 years - a great primer of how the Keys developed. The last part
are charts showing the Keys after one meter of sea level rise, then
charts of 2 meters, 3 meters, 4 meters and 5 meters rise in sea level.
The conclusion is all vestiges of the Keys will be under water with a 5
meter rise.
Space allows for most of the charts to
be
presented, but the idea should established. At the five-meter sea
rise only five peaks will survive: Solares Hill, Lignum Vitae Key,
Windley Key and two on Plantation Key. I will work
from south to north. The method used
is the present island or islands are outlined with dotted lines,
unfortunately these are very light in contrast, so look closely. When I
do include selected depths other than one meter, the dotted lines show
the change from the previous depth and not the original shore line.
Click on a chart to enlarge to its original size. The areas shaded in
black
will be above sea level. In the publication all five levels are shown
for comparison - I am only showing a one meter (39 inch) increase -
even using the worse-case scenarios, these areas will exist. These
charts do not consider the approximately two to three foot lunar tides,
or storm surges, or wind driven waves on top of a storm surge. Lets try
one beginning with Key West and Stock Island.
Lets remember that
this is from a 1990 publication, but the islands profiles have
not changed that much in 19 years. All of Stock Island is gone at 2
meters. This is true for the remaining Lower Keys. Only one spot on
Sugarloaf and Cudjoe Keys survive. There is a speck on Cudjoe that
survives at 3 meters. All the surrounding area of Solares Hill at Key West survives 2
meters, the principal top of Solares Hill remains at 3 meters, the very
top at 4 meters and a tiny speck at 5
meters.
Moving northward from
Key West is a chart of the Big Pine Key area. There will be a lot of
blank space between charts from here on,
especially beginning with a portrait shaped chart. I could have skipped
this one but the authors took a whole page for this illustration,
so here it is.
There are major implications to what will happen to the much loved
Florida Keys off shore reefs. Lidz and Shinn discuss the changes
to come as
the present Outer Reefs die because of increasing water depth (loss of
photothensis and cooler water) and the present Inner Reefs take their
place. It will not be a linear change as the present Outer Reefs have
the extremely deep and steep slope of the Continental Shelf upwelling
waters. They assume that the shelf will not change drastically.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Now for
the Middle Keys. It is clear that the other than the airport, the
southern part of Marathon is the highest. I am not certain whether this
was filled - it appears so - or if it was a ridge. The northern Middle
Keys is on the smaller chart over Key Vaca. These are the only two
charts in the booklet.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Now to the Upper
Keys again from south to north 
beginning with Lower and Upper Matecumbe Keys.
Lower Matecumbe Key basically disappears after a
a one-meter sea rise. Like most of Key Largo, Upper
Matecumbe is a ridge.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
More Upper Keys of Windley
and Plantation Keys: 
The four and five meter rises are not given, but the quarry area will
be last to to submerge.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
I will break Key Largo into three parts - Southern,
Middle and 
Northern - southern Key Largo shown first. There is significantly high knoll
in the Harry Harris Park area. Note that it survives even a four-meter
rise in sea level
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Middle Key Largo: 
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
North Key Largo, Angler's Club and Ocean Reef:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Elliott Key:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
NOAA does have a web page on sea level at:
http://co-ops.nos.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends.shtml
Sources:
Land from the Sea by
John Edward Hoffmeister, 1974;
Geology of the
Florida
Keys by Eugene A. Shinn, Oceanus, 1988 and Paleoshorelines,
Reefs, and
a Rising Sea: South Florida, U.S.A. by Barbara H. Lidz and Eugene A.
Shinn,
1990.
Additional reading:
Rachel Louise Carson (May 27,
1907 – April 14, 1964)
"Under the Sea Wind" , 1941, Simon &
Schuster,
"The Sea Around Us", 1951, Oxford
University Press
"The Edge of the Sea", 1955,
Mariner Books,
"Silent Spring", Houghton
Mifflin, 1962
-----End-----
Use the back arrow to return to Keys Geology
|